### ++ Kesselwanferner *

**KESSELWANFERNER,
AUSTRIA**

Historical Mass Balances (1942-2011)

**Figure 1.** Kesselwanferner, Austrian
Alps.

Kesselwandferner on July 29, .2009, photo by Marc Olefs

**Summary**

The historical Net, Ablation and Accumulation daily and annual
balances of the Kesselwanferner, Austria are determined for the
1942-2011 period with the PTAA model. Input to the model are daily
precipitation and temperature observations collected at the
Innsbruck weather station, located 100 km NE of the glacier,
together with the area-altitude distribution of the glacier. The
mean annual (Net) balance for this 70-year period is +0.03
mwe, the Accumulation balance is 0.72 mwe and the Ablation balance
is - 0.69 mwe. The glacier thickened 2 mwe, or +.03 meters of ice
per year during this 70-year period. But from 1990 to 2011 it
thinned 4 mwe or 0.4 meters of ice per year. The average
Equilibrium Line Altitude is 3140 meters. Comparison of measured
versus PTAA annual balances for the 1953-2011 period produced
an r^{2} of 0.37

**Mass Balance Results**

The PTAA Mass Balance Model (precipitation-temperature-area-altitude) is applied to the area-altitude distribution shown in Figure 2 to produce daily and annual balances, using as input the daily temperature and precipitation observations at Innsbruck, Austria, located approximately 100 km northeast of Kesselwanferner. Available weather records for this station are for the 1942-2012 period.

The annual mass balance for Kesselwanferner averaged for 70 years (1942-2011) is +0.03 mwe (Figure 3). (Figure 4). The average Accumulation Balance is 0.76 mwe and the Ablation Balance is -0.76 mwe (Figure 5) .

Mass balance terminology used in this report deviates slightly from that proposed by the IACS Working Group of Mass Balance Terminology and Methods (Cogley et al, 2011). The main variables that determine mass balance, such as precipitation, temperature, lapse rates and snowfall, are directly dependent on elevation. Glacier balance models are constructed by applying relationships between these variables (for example precipitation and temperature) to calculate mass balance as a function of elevation. The IACS study suggests that elevation should be shown on the Y axis. In this report, balance and other variables are all shown to be dependent on elevation.

In addition, the terms Accumulation Balance and Ablation Balance are preferred over Winter Balance and Summer Balance, that are used in the IACS report. Snow accumulation continues at the elevations for this and other Alpine glaciers throughout most of the year. For many Himalayan Range glaciers, snow accumulation is greatest during the Monsoon season, from June through September, and at lower elevations ablation often occurs during the winter months.

**Figure 2.** Area-altitude distribution of
Kesselwanferner. The total area of the glacier is km^{2}
and there are 58 altitude intervals spaced at 10 m, ranging from
2685-3485 meters in elevation.

Latitude 46°50'32.61"N Longitude 10°47'27.21"W

**Figure 3.** Annual balances of
Kesselwanferner, 1942-2011 period. The average annual balance is
0.00 mwe. The minimum annual balance for the period (-1.1 mwe)
occurred in 2003. The extremely negative balance for 2003 is
due to unprecedented ablation caused by much above normal
temperatures, and an unusually low winter snowfall.

**Figure 4.** Cumulative balance of
Kesselwanferner. From 1942-1980 the glacier gained nearly 6 mwe,
lost 4 mwe during the 12 years from 1981 to 2011.

**Figure 5.** Accumulation and Ablation
Balances. The average annual Accumulation balance for this
period is +0.76 mwe and the average Ablation balance is -0.76
mwe. The minimum Ablation Balance for this period (-1.6 mwe)
occurred in 2003.

**Balance versus Elevation, b(z)**

The net, accumulation and ablation balances as a function of elevation are shown in Figure 6, averaged for the 1942-2011 period, Average ablation at the terminus is 2 mwe and accumulation ranges from approximately 0.3 mwe at the terminus to a maximum of 1.0 mwe above 3600 meters. The ELA is 3040 meters.

**Figure 6a.** Net, Accumulation and Ablation
balances as a function of elevation, averaged for the 1942-2011
period. The ELA is 3140 meters.

**Figure 6b.** Net, Accumulation and Ablation
balances as a function of elevation, averaged for 2003. The ELA is
3500 meters.

**Model Calibration**

The model is calibrated by calculating the daily balance using 15 coefficients that convert precipitation and temperature observations to snow accumulation and snow and ice ablation for each elevation interval. One iteration performs this operation for each day of the full period of record and for each elevation interval, from the terminus to the head of the glacier. Both the annual balance and calibration error are calculated for each iteration.. In Figure 7a, the first 16 iterations use pre-set coefficients; the remaining are determined automatically by the simplex optimizing procedure. In Figure 7b, the annual balance and calibration error is shown for each iteration.

Optimum coefficient values are found by minimizing the error that occurs when one balance variable is regressed against another in a linear, least squares fitting process. Nine different, but not independent regressions are made for each day throughout the summer ablation season. From June 1 to- September 30, approximately 120 regressions are made for each set of variables. Thus, over 1000 regressions are run for each iteration of the Simplex. The calibration error determined for each iteration is the average root-mean-square-error (in percent of the mean) for all regressions that are run. The calibration error is minimized by simultaneously and minutely adjusting the 15 coefficients for the next iteration. Minimizing the calibration error produces an internal consistency in the processes within the PTAA model that cause snow and ice ablation and snow accumulation.

**Figure 7a.** Calibration error versus
iteration number of the optimizing simplex. Annual balances 1-15
are calculated with preset coefficients. Balances from 16 to 300
are calculated with coefficients determined by the Simplex
optimizing process. The final mean (1942-2011) balance after about
200 iterations equals 0.00 mwe.

**Figure 7b.** Mean annual balance versus
calibration error. The mean annual balance equals 0.00 when the
calibration error is a minimum at 48 %. Each point represents one
iteration.

**Real-time Glacier Balances**

One goal of the PTAAGMB project is to continuously monitor all 200 glaciers in the set and display the current mass balance of each one, in real-time if up-to-date weather observations are available, or near real-time if weather observations are delayed. The daily balances for the 2003 balance year shown in Figure 8 demonstrate how real-time mass balances will be displayed in the future years.

**Figure 8. ** Daily Accumulation, Ablation
and Net Balance for the 2003 balance year. The Accumulation Balance
on September 30 = 0.5 mwe, the Ablation Balance = -3.1 mwe, and the
Net Balance = -2.6 mwe. The low snowfall and high summer
temperatures caused this year's balance to be the most negative
since 1942.

**Figure 9a. ** Annual balances produced by
field measurments and the PTAA model from 1953-2011.

**Figure 9b. ** Measured versus PTAA annual
balances for the 1953-2011 period. The r2 for a regression fit is
0.37.